From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18955: Makefile:382: recipe for target 'src' failed Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvdwthpx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0d4mudlgty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83ppd1t2eh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415291491 30542 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2014 16:31:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18955@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alexander Shukaev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 06 17:31:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxw-0003V8-IH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:31:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxw-0007DH-6l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:31:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxn-0007CR-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxf-0001uH-0v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxe-0001ty-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPxe-000611-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18955 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18955-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18955.141529140923029 (code B ref 18955); Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18955) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2014 16:30:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPwm-0005z3-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:36746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XmPwj-0005ys-1p for 18955@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NEM00400L7NCK00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 18955@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:25:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NEM00LWMLM0ON80@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:25:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95624 > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:17:25 +0100 > From: Alexander Shukaev > Cc: 18955@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org > > So what do we do with this problem? I think we should close it. > Would you need anything else to test from me or you already know how > to fix it? Nothing is needed, thanks. Not unless the problem returns.