From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1452: Acknowledgement (23.0.60; Problem with nextstep, longlines-mode,) Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:02:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuy92x9h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20081129.145347.35808910.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.155222.124907962.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.161126.71259916.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <5vy4c46ifr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83oacz5188.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4c32wwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2nm2gyi.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452182642 19068 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2016 16:04:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanche@math.ntnu.no, jwiegley@gmail.com, 1452@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrew Hyatt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 17:03:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD21-00083g-89 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:03:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD20-0004dL-MH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1n-0004Ot-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1i-0000j3-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1i-0000iz-5c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1h-0002UR-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:03:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 16:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1452 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 1452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1452.14521825629547 (code B ref 1452); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 16:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2016 16:02:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1K-0002Tr-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49643) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD1F-0002Td-HS for 1452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD15-0000Uu-Ai for 1452@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD15-0000Ug-7g; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1669 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aHD14-0003XV-4O; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:22 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Andrew Hyatt on Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:54:30 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111323 Archived-At: > From: Andrew Hyatt > Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, hanche@math.ntnu.no, 1452@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:54:30 -0500 > > > We could define a policy, like a package is deleted after so-and-so > > many months/years in obsolete/. > > If you think such a policy would be possible, then I'm happy to propose > it in emacs-devel. Maybe obsolete packages can spend one major version > in obsolete, and get deleted in the next major version? Or, maybe we > can be more aggressive, especially if you think that we can do this over > periods of months, and obsolete and deprecate based on minor version instead. Please do propose that. (You will have to explain what does 'spend one major version in obsolete" means, though: suppose a package was declared obsolete in v24.5, when will it be removed?) Thanks.