From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27585: segfault when evaluating a file containing only backticks Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 19:19:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83fue9mtb7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1499235670.28433.1@ssh.steve.org.uk> <83van6n2ty.fsf@gnu.org> <1499280931.14677.1@ssh.steve.org.uk> <83tw2qmzsl.fsf@gnu.org> <6EDA4B5A-B345-4A8A-8F03-2925B671505B@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499358077 12580 195.159.176.226 (6 Jul 2017 16:21:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: steve@steve.org.uk, 27585@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 06 18:21:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9Wc-0002ky-5G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 18:21:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9Wh-0000CR-Ez for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9Wc-0000CM-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9WY-0001hE-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9WY-0001gz-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9WX-0007u0-Jp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27585 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27585-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27585.149935800630310 (code B ref 27585); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2017 16:20:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9Vd-0007sn-Nn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34491) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9Vc-0007sG-1H for 27585@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9VT-0000kL-SP for 27585@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9VT-0000kD-Ob; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:19:55 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3531 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dT9VS-000152-S9; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:19:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <6EDA4B5A-B345-4A8A-8F03-2925B671505B@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:52:44 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134279 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:52:44 -0700 > CC: 27585@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Daniel Colascione > > >Moreover, there are those among us (I'm not one of them) who thinks > >Emacs shouldn't even try to recover from stack overflow, they say it > >should crash hard right there and then. > > Native stack? Certainly. Yes, this discussion is about the native stack, not the ELisp stack. > Recovering when elisp blows the stack is a different matter. I believe we already do that.