From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:58:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83fts7kd6q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wolugz2r.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1aq1ui.fsf@gnu.org> <83o972pz92.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="261820"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gustaf Waldemarson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 28 19:00:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyj-0015vk-W9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:00:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44255 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyj-00027F-1J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyb-00024m-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyV-0001fR-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyU-0001e0-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPyT-00029O-Tm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:00:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34589.15513767498180 (code B ref 34589); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2019 17:59:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPxd-00027s-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56305) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPxb-00027f-7Y for 34589@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPxN-0001Cs-8t; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4765 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gzPxC-0000x8-9N; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:45 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Gustaf Waldemarson on Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:05:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155902 Archived-At: > From: Gustaf Waldemarson > Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:05:35 +0100 > Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org > > I'm afraid I have some bad news regarding the patches. As I was > looking for someone internally at Arm to sign the employer disclaimer > I was stopped by the legal department. Apparently Arm has taken the > stance that signing such a disclaimer could "open a legal door which > could expose intellectual property in the future". Thus, I'm afraid no > one at Arm will sign such a disclaimer at this time and consequently, > these patches cannot be used in Emacs. > > I'm not exactly a lawyer, but I believe the patches can still be used > as a reference for implementing the feature, but as I mentioned I'm > afraid they cannot be used as-is. > > Sorry about the trouble, I didn't really expect the company to stop > something like this. Sorry to hear that. Does the first patch have value on its own? If so, we can accept it without legal paperwork. Thanks.