From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37178: 26.2; doc strings of `eshell' and `eshell-buffer-name' Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:47:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftjo7vhq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0d877d24-e2d3-4b4c-b57d-aafd8cf77c3c@default> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="187602"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37178@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 19 14:48:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9T-000mZ6-3y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54140 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9R-0005EQ-Gb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9L-0005EG-N0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9K-00050L-PL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9K-00050E-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo9K-0004jY-H3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37178 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37178-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37178.157148925318159 (code B ref 37178); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37178) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2019 12:47:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo8r-0004io-CS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54167) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo8p-0004iX-0s for 37178@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo8j-0004bT-I4; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4346 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iLo8i-0001CB-Uo; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 08:47:25 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:22:20 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169735 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:22:20 +0200 > Cc: 37178@debbugs.gnu.org > > It picks <4> in this case, which I think makes sense. But I don't > think the doc string needs to go into that level of detail, since that > part of the behaviour is less important than the use cases: I think we don't need to document this specifically, because the special interpretation of just "C-u" is well documented in the Emacs manual, and should be familiar to users.