From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 05:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83fthl54h7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wobbjlm0.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> <87tv6fjco6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20b3b02b-8018-49cd-4ab3-702ccf9e1c28@gmx.at> <87d0d0i7hk.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <25861c90-bdb5-e873-7da7-22a8d997f4b6@gmx.at> <871rtghy2v.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2975a018-4c5c-4da4-f236-8eb4338a9829@gmx.at> <878sngvhaf.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <13a1e840-7ca3-fb70-e773-de12089bd97e@gmx.at> <8736domoza.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <94dc09f8-6ef4-f493-db7b-52b0d218f715@gmx.at> <87zhfwkwb5.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <647006dc-42e1-a242-4fda-2f129943fc98@gmx.at> <87v9qjl00x.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83a77v6spt.fsf@gnu.org> <87blsbcd1o.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <831rt76nbo.fsf@gnu.org> <877e2x66wp.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83y2vd62d6.fsf@gnu.org> <87immhnexa.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="142172"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 16 04:35:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ighA5-000arY-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:35:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ighA4-0000V9-JV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1igh9y-0000Uw-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igh9x-0004dg-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igh9x-0004dc-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1igh9x-0002RD-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38497.15764672449288 (code B ref 38497); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 03:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2019 03:34:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1igh92-0002Pk-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:34:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44257) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1igh90-0002PF-1W for 38497@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igh8u-0003x8-Ns; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:33:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1574 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1igh8u-0002hr-87; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:33:56 -0500 In-reply-to: <87immhnexa.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:10:41 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173413 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 38497@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:10:41 +0800 > > > One possible reason for not clearing the frame is that you have > > double-buffering enabled. Can you disable it and try again? (If you > > don't know how, search for "double buffering" in etc/NEWS.26.) > > I tried to disable double buffering. > Running emacs -Q --eval "(add-to-list 'default-frame-alist > '(inhibit-double-buffering . t))", the redrawing works without any > issues. Thanks, that probably explains everything discussed in this bug report. > Now, I am wondering if the issue I reported is just specific to my > system or others can also reproduce it with emacs compiled with xft, > cairo, and lucid enabled. If so, would it make sense to disable double > buffering by default for this combination of build options? I don't know. There are a few open bugs regarding double buffering which await debugging. Can someone please try reproducing Ihor's problem by building Emacs with the same options? TIA.