From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40727: 27.0.91; 'cl-loop ... across ... and' seems broken Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 09:11:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftckw5f4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871ro5nojr.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9lgmtj8.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="33951"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40727@debbugs.gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 01 08:14:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOw7-0008kI-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:14:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36894 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOw6-0001Et-5I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOvt-0001Dx-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:14:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOu2-000863-MM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOu2-00085w-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOu2-0002Vx-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 06:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40727 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 40727-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40727.15883135099644 (code B ref 40727); Fri, 01 May 2020 06:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2020 06:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOtp-0002VU-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35346) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOtm-0002VH-VW for 40727@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:11:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOth-0007Qq-OF; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1675 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jUOth-0000yn-2v; Fri, 01 May 2020 02:11:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9lgmtj8.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:40:43 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179419 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:40:43 -0400 > Cc: 40727@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha > > Eli, is it okay to push both of these to emacs-27? Alternatively, > reverting both fixes to Bug#29799 in addition to the Bug#29866 fix > works: I prefer reverting, thanks.