From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41373: GNU ELPA: Add "reporting bugs" to individual package pages Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 22:38:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftbeefvn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imgr9nr3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r1v85qs3.fsf@gnu.org> <87imgkt469.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h7vvjnyf.fsf@gnu.org> <877dwqbpxh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83k10qeih8.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu5ma8rs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="22101"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bzg@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, 41373@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 01 21:39:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqH7-0005eW-Eu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 21:39:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqH6-0001hE-BB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqH0-0001gv-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqH0-0002n6-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqH0-0005mh-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41373 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41373-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41373.159104030522192 (code B ref 41373); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41373) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2020 19:38:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqGP-0005lq-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqGN-0005ld-Ti for 41373@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqGI-0002ji-6n; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4408 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jfqGA-00024c-OH; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:38:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mu5ma8rs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:25:11 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181370 Archived-At: > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 41373@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, > rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru > Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:25:11 -0700 > > > I'm not sure I understand the need to produce a potentially huge list > > of completion candidates, when it isn't even clear that the bug is > > about some add-on package. Can we be smarter about this? > > Right, this is the part of the suggestion with the biggest question > marks. I can imagine the prompt would get annoying for frequent > contributors who are mostly filing bugs against emacs itself. > > The only thing I can think of is providing a separate command, > `report-emacs-package-bug', that is a thin wrapper around > `report-emacs-bug'. That could live in package.el. I thought about making some conclusions from the text of the report, which may contain function names. Of course, this is only possible after the report is written and is about to be sent.