From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41506: 28.0.50; RTL problem Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 22:07:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftbdcmm3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838shhxuff.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuztctpk.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="28082"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41506@debbugs.gnu.org To: pipcet@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 02 21:09:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCHf-0007AY-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 21:09:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCHe-0002Ag-1S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCHW-0002AM-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCHW-0001Uv-BU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCHW-0007bv-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41506 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 41506-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41506.159112489529196 (code B ref 41506); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41506) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2020 19:08:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCGl-0007aq-28 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCGj-0007aX-9J for 41506@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCGe-0001Pq-2o; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3283 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jgCGc-0005qS-6C; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:08:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83tuztctpk.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:34:31 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181422 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:34:31 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 41506@debbugs.gnu.org > > So I guess whatever issues I had back then were meanwhile solved "by > other means", and you should install this patch. If there is indeed > some subtlety here, it will present itself sooner or later (like, in > another 11 years). Btw, please note that some residual problem remains: after the patch, if a buffer begins with 2 newlines and an RTL letter, the first screen line is rendered right-to-left, which is wrong. You can see that it's wrong if you insert more newlines at BOB: then only the single empty line immediately before the RTL letter is rendered right-to-left. Of course, this is better than the original problem.