From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44002: 27.1; Small window height with VcXsrv X server when built with gtk3 toolkit Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:34:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83ft6dtcua.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d01iwrsa.fsf@gnu.org> <83d01iugyn.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2k5thky.fsf@gnu.org> <9ad655db-7735-fb80-4517-3e3aaec13ee1@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10321"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44002@debbugs.gnu.org, jsberg-bnl@outlook.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 17 11:36:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kTidH-0002au-K8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:36:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57856 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTidG-0002S0-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTid9-0002Rq-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTid7-0007ps-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTid7-0008OJ-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 09:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44002 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44002-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44002.160292731332193 (code B ref 44002); Sat, 17 Oct 2020 09:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44002) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2020 09:35:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTic7-0008Ma-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTic5-0008MM-T8 for 44002@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTic0-0007bC-LJ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4262 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kTibz-0007Dv-A3; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9ad655db-7735-fb80-4517-3e3aaec13ee1@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:32:39 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190790 Archived-At: > Cc: 44002@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:32:39 +0200 > > > Martin, any comments on the proposed patch? Or on the problem in > > general? > > I applied it here and didn't see any detrimental effects. I suppose we > should just install it and look whether it causes problems with any of > our window managers. Do you think it is safe enough for the emacs-27 branch? > For me the most interesting aspect is that it apparently works with > GTK2. Maybe comparing the traces of GTK2 and GTK3 runs could reveal > more. Or comparing a GTK3 trace with that of a Lucid build. > > > Btw, do we understand why this happens only with VcXsrv? > > I never used VcXsrv so I don't know how it works. As an example, I have > no idea what the "top level window" is and why it is not the same as the > "window associated with the frame". Also, the fact that a "bogus > height" is propagated while a "bogus width" is not, hints at yet another > unresolved mystery. Agreed. Maybe the OP could help us understand some of that.