From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34404: 26.1; Finalizer in hash table run early? Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:23:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83ft4wqjr6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6151161.jHdu2dTOOM@gabor> <87sg8wtitq.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20069"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 34404@debbugs.gnu.org, braungb88@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 26 15:27:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiIFN-00057I-Mv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:27:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47678 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiIFM-0002QS-L9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:27:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiICk-0008AL-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiICk-0006ov-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiICk-0008JT-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34404.160640066631898 (code B ref 34404); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 14:24:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiICA-0008IQ-CW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiIC8-0008IC-4o for 34404@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiIC2-0006S5-Q9; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3795 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kiIBz-000874-KJ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:24:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sg8wtitq.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:15:45 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194333 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:15:45 +0100 > Cc: 34404@debbugs.gnu.org > > This does seem like a bug... if Emacs is using a mark-and-sweep garbage > collector, which I thought it did. But Andreas (in a different bug > report) seemed to imply that Emacs uses a conservative garbage collector > these days, and I see that there's some talk about that in the source > code, but... it's documented to be a mark-and-sweep gc. > > So now I'm confused: Is Emacs still using a pure mark-and-sweep gc as > the Emacs Internals section of the elisp manual says? Yes.