From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34404: 26.1; Finalizer in hash table run early? Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:23:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83ft4vp5si.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6151161.jHdu2dTOOM@gabor> <87sg8wtitq.fsf@gnus.org> <366c6cbb-d9fe-d672-12f7-3f04987555ac@gmx.at> <87mtz3kzbi.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38240"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 34404@debbugs.gnu.org, braungb88@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 09:24:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ3J-0009qD-Rf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:24:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ3I-0001pp-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2w-0001ob-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2w-0006dJ-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2w-000203-7v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34404.16064654137648 (code B ref 34404); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2020 08:23:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2T-0001zH-5S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2R-0001z5-Ah for 34404@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2L-0006PE-WF; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2703 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kiZ2L-00033A-Bt; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 03:23:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtz3kzbi.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:56:33 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194414 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:56:33 +0100 > Cc: 34404@debbugs.gnu.org, Braun Gábor > > The Emacs documentation seems to imply that Emacs has one of these 100% > garbage collectors, which is what this bug report is about, I think: The > user has an object that the gc should collect, but it's not collected > (always). The question is how do you define "100%"? The Emacs GC is conservative in the sense that when there's a doubt whether an object _could_ be still referenced, we mark it so it doesn't get swept.