From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47529: Make quoted entities stand out more in info Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:08:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83ft0ah1fy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tuoqh5ih.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7kqh292.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32734"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47529@debbugs.gnu.org To: scame Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 01 10:09:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsOC-0008Oz-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 10:09:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsOB-0001aZ-6L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNy-0001aN-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNy-0004pJ-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNy-00081R-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47529 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47529-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47529.161726452530813 (code B ref 47529); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47529) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 08:08:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNh-00080v-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41014) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNf-00080g-1T for 47529@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:08:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNY-0004Z6-6t; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:08:37 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4061 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lRsNX-0004uw-LN; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 04:08:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from scame on Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:54:47 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203412 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:54:47 +0000 > From: scame > Cc: "47529@debbugs.gnu.org" <47529@debbugs.gnu.org> > > > Oh, so you would like to change that face's defaults? Then my > > personal take on this is that (assuming we want to use a non-default > > color in this case) the color you propose is too prominent. > > That color was just an example to show the difference. Sure, but to get this moving in some practical direction, you (or someone else) will have to come up with a color that will fly with enough people to justify the change in the default definition of the face. > BTW, how are these things decided? What is the process? By a lot of bikeshedding, I'm afraid. Which is why I personally consider this kind of discussion a big waste of time, when everyone can customize the face to their liking. YMMV, of course.