From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51037: [PATCH] Make `print-level` & `print-length` customizable in ERT batch tests Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 11:25:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83fstd1bth.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86tuhvmtpl.fsf@runbox.com> <877deqec10.fsf@gnus.org> <83fste2u4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87ily94662.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15318"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sp1ff@runbox.com, 51037@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 10:27:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOkA-0003jd-JP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 10:27:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOk8-0007od-Ps for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOk2-0007o4-RY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOk2-0000aX-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOk2-0006Sg-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51037 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51037-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51037.163359516424765 (code B ref 51037); Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51037) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2021 08:26:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45929 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOj5-0006RN-OQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOj1-0006Qm-7a for 51037@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOiv-0007vo-RQ; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3901 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYOiN-0006Am-VV; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 04:25:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ily94662.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:59:01 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216617 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: sp1ff@runbox.com, 51037@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:59:01 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-10/msg00395.html > > > > for how that makes debugging more difficult than it has to be. > > > > So how about using huge values in batch? Are there any downsides? > > It'll make the error summaries completely unreadable Sorry, I don't think I understand: why would that make them unreadable? Text terminals wrap long lines. Or what am I missing? Can you perhaps show an example of such an unreadable error summary? And even if this is something specific to ERT, why not use a huge value in batch-mode by default, and bind the variables to smaller values in ERT? > But when making a specific test (i.e., "make subr-tests" etc) it would > indeed be nice to have untruncated backtraces. I think adding these new > variables would allow us to do this. OK, but I was thinking about a more general problem, not just about ERT. The backtraces displayed in batch-mode are truncated too early, and that makes them useless many times.