From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 16:38:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83fsqxopl5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnkazv3i.fsf@dick> <87r1aie4hr.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee6ip8ej.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf0q6otw.fsf@dick> <83wnkanib0.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7be6lej.fsf@dick> <83pmq2neab.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufd529i.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 52440@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 12 15:40:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ1O-00031b-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:40:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ1M-0004eC-MJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ1C-0004dx-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ1C-0007aM-0V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ1B-0005zf-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52440 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo patch wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 52440-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52440.163931994122960 (code B ref 52440); Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2021 14:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51009 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ0D-0005yD-Ag for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:39:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46468) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ0A-0005xv-RD for 52440@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:38:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=60916 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ05-0007Sm-EE; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:38:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=dwzStryoo0fiUmAPNGCt8yh+xYnRuzov9RIgZP/nbcY=; b=Aoo2GJxSj433 ndEaktSP+YUyTpWKDORTN/fKymvdK720xaVDJjkYV3Qv0sFNv18ahDpKZ2sAf76MrwjHBtC4qfKZq S7PUJ5HVHwYZfry1KAOGTHmZvqN+nuF1+QHslb61a1v2n35SWE3ACLyTa6FYTmA2kCjyM90I7jtrR mJHVNrvwb6va6jLsCxQsKokfqjaNgqtqq0ZDMBS/uWGaZWsW3JmR06LElTbYC/MUlpyacWVvGztE1 O7ckpdFIY9Us4mIhnsrE9Piq05mZDEWm8vOkqrM888HauuTQWCILzMf/4crn/sLQQiHD0zWForSgC SqecfsgxTEwjGI4GqIkTsg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4343 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwQ05-0006l3-8w; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:38:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tufd529i.fsf@dick> (message from dick on Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:25:13 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222234 Archived-At: > From: dick > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 52440@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 09:25:13 -0500 > > > It's the other way around: separating them will NOT make rebuilds less > > frequent. So it's kinda fruitless, as separations go. > > Interesting. I just edited sqlite.h in my fork, and it didn't recompile > the world. I guess sqlite.h in your fork includes only some of the sqlite stuff, then. Which then begs the question why have it in more than one place? Or maybe your sqlite.h includes lisp.h, which is also not a very good idea. You cannot usefully separate into different files parts of the Lisp interpreter, they are too intertwined. Might as well stop trying. Anyway, this seems to be about personal stylistic preferences, so any further argument is futile.