From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:50:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83fskbxyms.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmjfy2xk.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtejy0y0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37247"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 55869@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=AE=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B0_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=82=E0=A4=B9?= Sameer Singh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 13:34:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzzNn-0009Rd-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:34:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57014 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzzNl-0002iW-Ow for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 07:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhq-0001TC-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhq-0000Oh-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhq-000865-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 55869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55869.165494463331089 (code B ref 55869); Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2022 10:50:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhN-00085M-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:50:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhM-000857-0M for 55869@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:50:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhG-0000Lg-LS; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:50:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=5Ky5JZtUT7aZABxhPUzHAqdpFQ9oxn1pjAMuwUy1ILw=; b=qVOnAu0s5BQf0t0uDIGa FSRPXyR7CJgM2GmuuI3v25wNigfqKQ8Q6ZzPxP47OVStg/nsZGidLmG+F8vykDqAnxAYLt4FMIzPW 3pFNo3rwKPho6VoFXR0HRegEv1+7NLCAZ7MKs6RtQ+WU6jiGtuWeDiqRy3DbIXfTpq+UV6/bwOkJB A4GAlWJ2z05G14V3gorZlYVAcy5tZG0VSOvW86tDMQOCU0IvaaiwB8dZfxESKQIIXISiiJSLr5hw8 XbOE46TdBs6pndKoQScyO5joWzNRu3DF6Tbm1UX9nnxf4ocEctRWfcFpHOl8w15H08aze56A+kG2S 8/om0499x4kTpA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3202 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzyhG-00050M-3x; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:50:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=AE=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B0_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=82=E0=A4=B9?= Sameer Singh on Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:43 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234265 Archived-At: > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:43 +0530 > Cc: 55869@debbugs.gnu.org > > I am sorry, I do not understand the question, I have not used a transliterated name for the Lepcha script. > > If you are asking whether to use ᰛᰩᰵ (Róng) or ᰛᰩᰵᰛᰧᰵᰶ (Róng-ríng), I think both are fine. Yes, that is my question. I understand that both are probably fine, but I'm asking whether we should use what appears on two widely-used sites. IOW, why prefer the version that doesn't appear there, if both versions are equally correct? > The omniglot website also describes other name for this script: > > The Lepcha script is known as ᰀᰂ (kakha - the first two letters), ᰇᰨᰕᰧᰵᰶ (chomíng - "written > letters") or ᰕᰧᰵᰶᰙᰳ (míngzât - "treasure of letters"). Yes, but Wikipedia doesn't, so I think Róng-ríng wins here.