From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68254: EWW =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98readable=E2=80=99?= by default Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 15:35:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83frzbvr66.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v888uhdn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68254@debbugs.gnu.org To: Navajeeth Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 14:37:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkNs-0000IS-Qs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:37:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkNf-0007XA-3k; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkNe-0007X2-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkNe-0008EQ-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkNi-0001PL-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68254.17044617725342 (code B ref 68254); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 13:36:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkMt-0001O6-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:36:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkMo-0001NS-A1 for 68254@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLkMe-0007wG-IY; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:35:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=4AmdvJYOymTFHacF+u1fxJVjdbNzuFMqE2gvL4h+1JU=; b=i3Y5EBu3G8NgT3T23pQy hYMYOJL7vtMjqrVmuXBeKVnVKS7eSrjEXMmaNhsTQnlmnWYIsawswB3SaHNdUvJCCKUJdAPQ951Oj TB+F7wtKZ6RJg/AD/dW4JKHG9ightSHse79UJ++i2C6P+e2RyHfSZVEF6ywEr4bEf1tt0G+LKphZC z7TwmctjnpU2U/fxfgJp0uQL0sxkFzptvrfj3arV8WqXwMRym8MKZwXvddMlrgrbJ2kHqLk0xmGSg v2qvGwMvnbFecwMmYP9q+3PBng/cKWXaVD2taYu5LRKES0rVReRjTwPLvHe5EkLZLPxDGxhNkwjtV 6Jfozn6es0Pvuw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Navajeeth on Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:08:29 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277389 Archived-At: [Please use Reply All to reply, so that the bug tracker is CC'ed.] > Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:08:29 +0000 > From: Navajeeth > > I’ve tried that method. While at first it appears to work how I want, it’s sub-optimal because it clutters > your history with two version of every webpage you open: one the full non-readable version and then > the readable version generated by the after-render-hook. Going back in the history is a chore, > you need to press ‘l’ twice to go back one webpage. > > I used to tolerate it for a while, but now I feel that there could be a better way.