From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83ei1jv9hb.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311268699 18500 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2011 17:18:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 19:18:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwt2-0006Y3-FE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:18:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46479 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwt2-0006P6-0a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwsz-0006P0-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwst-0002IH-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwst-0002IC-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwss-0004hX-Km; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9132 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9132-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9132.131126867918062 (code B ref 9132); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9132) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 17:17:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwsp-0004hH-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:17:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjwsn-0004h5-9N for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LOP006001D5T900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9132@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:49 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.133.66]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LOP0065V1DO23D0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:17:49 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:18:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49506 Archived-At: > From: Sam Steingold > Cc: 9132@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:53:57 -0400 > > > Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or > > does it fail in the same way? > > the exact same error, even if I load bytecomp.el explicitly with -l And bytecomp.el was given with leading directories or just literally as "bytecomp.el"? What happens if you invoke Emacs interactively from the src/oo-spd/i386 directory, then visit latin-ltx.el, and type "M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile RET", with or without loading bytecomp.el?