From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11867: 24.1.50; Windows bootstrap crash (converting tit files?) Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:31:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83ehoklwvi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y5mw23p0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341851531 9035 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2012 16:32:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 11867@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 09 18:32:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGsR-0005UX-3m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:31:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGsQ-0007nj-30 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGsJ-0007nd-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGsE-0007yf-VI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:31:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGsE-0007yZ-Rh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGxK-0006Sk-7e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11867 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11867-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11867.134185180724822 (code B ref 11867); Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11867) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2012 16:36:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGx4-0006SI-MW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:60750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoGx0-0006S9-W4 for 11867@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M6W00500J31D600@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11867@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:31:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M6W005CVJ8A3FB0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:31:22 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61763 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:56:15 +0200 > Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 11867@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Which means the problem only happens when the byte compiler runs > > interpreted. > > This is a not-very-helpful backtrace. Are you sure there were only 3 threads?