From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13449: 24.3.50; Perl mode composed symbols not visible Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:55:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83ehhl7yax.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837gnequws.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5fupdvr.fsf@gnu.org> <83pq168ebq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358362537 3111 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2013 18:55:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13449-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 19:55:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY9P-0001Mn-GJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:55:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY99-0000R7-4v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY96-0000Pb-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY92-0008Am-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY92-0008Ai-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY9c-00022u-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:56:04 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13449 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13449@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, rcopley@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 13449-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13449.13583625617848 (code D ref 13449); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13449-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 18:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY9Y-00022V-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:54752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvY9U-00022D-VD for 13449-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MGQ00400F5HG100@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 13449-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:55:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MGQ0047UF83AL50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:55:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69875 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:08:50 +0000 > From: Richard Copley > > > So can we close this bug? > > I should think so, yes. Not an Emacs bug. Great, closing. > Only tangentially related: would it be reasonable to mention > `perl-prettify-symbols' in NEWS? I guess so, but since I don't use Perl mode, I will defer to someone who does to do that. Thanks.