From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83ehbzs8zk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371571401 13474 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2013 16:03:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 18:03:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyNI-0001Oq-6m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:03:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyNH-0000oK-Px for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyN9-0000gZ-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyN4-0007bn-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyN4-0007bi-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyN4-00070t-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14631 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14631-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14631.137157133126844 (code B ref 14631); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 16:02:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyMF-0006yt-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyMC-0006yZ-J8 for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:02:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOL00J00J6BHZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOL00IUXJ7EZC90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75293 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:41 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Juanma Barranquero , 14631@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This is because we somehow call unblock_input more than we call > > block_input. Do we have any facilities to find out where this > > happens? Stefan? anyone? > > Add parameters to block_input and unblock_input to remember where they > were called from. I think that such an investment should pay off in the > long run. Would you like to do that, please?