From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20068: 24.4.91; Too many warnings building Emacs Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:45:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83egox5rs8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mw3lhj53.fsf@moondust.localdomain> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425966444 10361 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2015 05:47:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 05:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nljlistbox2@gmail.com, 20068@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 10 06:47:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0Z-0000zO-5I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:47:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46602 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0Y-0005tK-Da for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0V-0005sM-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0Q-0007vS-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0Q-0007vG-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVD0P-0006UC-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 05:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 20068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20068.142596638024880 (code B ref 20068); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 05:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 05:46:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVCzk-0006TD-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:43312) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVCzh-0006Ss-7x for 20068@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NKZ00I00EJDIT00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 20068@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:46:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NKZ00IOVEOYAJB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:46:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100342 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:31:08 -0400 > Cc: 20068@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If you get that many warnings, you must be doing a bootstrap No, he isn't. A small number of Lisp files are byte-compiled when building a release tarball (this was fixed by you on master, I think), and the files he mentions are those. > Lisp compilation errors are never (good enough) platform specific and > can always be ignored by non-developers. Indeed, in this case I looked at the reported warnings and saw nothing grave there, I'm quite sure I saw the same warnings when I built the pretest.