From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20538: 24.4; Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 05:41:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83egmpnohs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874mnly25v.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431225690 2413 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2015 02:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 02:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20538@debbugs.gnu.org To: Roland Winkler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 04:41:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHB3-0000NR-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 04:41:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60865 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHB2-0001ww-P9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAz-0001wl-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAu-0000iK-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAu-0000iE-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAu-0007Bb-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:41:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 02:41:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20538 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 20538-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20538.143122565727600 (code B ref 20538); Sun, 10 May 2015 02:41:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20538) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2015 02:40:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAm-0007B5-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:39647) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YrHAi-0007Ap-GW for 20538@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2015 22:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NO400L004H1FX00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 20538@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:40:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NO400LBY4RXCK60@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 May 2015 05:40:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <874mnly25v.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102628 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 14:35:40 -0500 > From: "Roland Winkler" > > > I do not know how I got into this (sorry, I do not have a recipe to > reproduce this either). I have a frame I want to delete by running > delete-frame. Yet this only gives me the error message > > "Attempt to delete a surrogate minibuffer frame" > > and delete-frame refuses to do its job. What does this mean? It means you tried to delete a frame that serves as a minibuffer for another frame.