From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:32:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83egfcvhzi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <83mw0muv5m.fsf@gnu.org> <5569AD7F.2000402@yandex.ru> <83iobautar.fsf@gnu.org> <5569BE61.7010200@yandex.ru> <83a8wmuog6.fsf@gnu.org> <5569D136.90802@yandex.ru> <837frquilf.fsf@gnu.org> <5569F77D.5070903@yandex.ru> <831thxvr7d.fsf@gnu.org> <556A12A2.8030002@yandex.ru> <86y4dlv3xt.fsf@yandex.ru> <83two8vkab.fsf@gnu.org> <56572F51.5050006@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448555665 28599 80.91.229.3 (26 Nov 2015 16:34:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 26 17:34:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUn-0003Q9-9L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:34:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUp-0001Z7-HG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUj-0001UJ-IF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUg-0004RL-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUg-0004R8-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zUf-0007vw-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.144855560830453 (code B ref 20629); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2015 16:33:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54504 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zTp-0007ub-BF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:33:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:55199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1zTm-0007uS-Lt for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYF00300KI4HB00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:32:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYF003MHKM9BX00@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:32:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <56572F51.5050006@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109294 Archived-At: > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:12:01 +0200 > > On 11/26/2015 05:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > If we don't want to have duplicate qualified+unqualified entries for > > OO languages, then no, there's nothing left to fix. > > Right. I thought that was also already done, for some reason. It wasn't done because the discussion didn't reach any consent. > Should we create a dedicated issue for that? It concerns not only C++, > but also Lua (as we've found out recently), and other languages (whether > we want to tackle them now or not). Yes, we could create a separate issue.