From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23179: 25.0.92; Restore `M-,' to continue etags search Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 19:18:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83egakm3lu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <48066d7c-e4d3-acf5-fdcf-1aa9a108cb90@yandex.ru> <83bn5ttwul.fsf@gnu.org> <83shz4sdi0.fsf@gnu.org> <5a9b5719-ea84-89bc-c0c5-37692fafd23d@yandex.ru> <83inzypm94.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1q6plhb.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8lapkpt.fsf@gnu.org> <831t6mozrd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvp9nzl9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3ekm6na.fsf@gnu.org> <399c5831-4b74-5a84-4024-31fe3570b6ae@yandex.ru> <83inzwm4ln.fsf@gnu.org> <511f6e09-6ce1-9408-29dd-72e6ae252dcb@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459873223 29444 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2016 16:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23179@debbugs.gnu.org, andlind@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 18:20:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anTi8-00073Z-V5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:20:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anTi5-0004lm-BG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anTi2-0004lE-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anThy-0003lx-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anThy-0003lt-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anThy-0003Rr-E4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23179.145987314213165 (code B ref 23179); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2016 16:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anTgz-0003QB-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anTgy-0003Py-Ts for 23179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anTgs-0003Wd-RC for 23179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anTgp-0003Va-0L; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4405 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1anTgS-0003qR-C5; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:18:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <511f6e09-6ce1-9408-29dd-72e6ae252dcb@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:00:53 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116076 Archived-At: > Cc: 23179@debbugs.gnu.org, andlind@gmail.com > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:00:53 +0300 > > On 04/05/2016 06:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> The idea is that the other UI should really be a new > >> xref-show-xrefs-function, that's what that variable is there for (you > >> can make it a defcustom). It would be better to avoid coupling the two UIs. > > > > If the difference will prove to be more significant, I can see the > > point. > > The difference will hopefully increase in the future. And then we'll be > happy that the user doesn't need to change their customization. The defcustom can control also which function(s) are called. Asking users to customize options whose values are functions is something I think we should avoid as much as possible. > > I thought that if one invokes next-error immediately after xref > > collected the matches, this danger is avoided. Isn't that true? > > Not necessarily (e.g. if you have a Grep buffer visible). And a > next-error-function-capable buffer can come up after one of the > next-error invocations. I guess those who want the UI be hidden will have to consider this caveat and deal with it, if and when it happens. TANSTAAFL.