From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Steve Kemp <steve@steve.org.uk>
Cc: 27585@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27585: segfault when evaluating a file containing only backticks
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 19:24:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83efttmt3c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499355222.18729.1@ssh.steve.org.uk> (message from Steve Kemp on Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:33:42 +0000)
> From: Steve Kemp <steve@steve.org.uk>
> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:33:42 +0000
>
> In short your initial response to this particular case seems
> like it would apply to any similar issue which is liable to
> be discovered - they'd be genuine bugs, but they'd also be things
> that would never happen "in the wild", so while they wouldn't
> be ignored, it would be easy to push them to the back of the queue.
That wasn't my intent, and I apologize if my wording somehow implied
that. I was only talking about the particular crash you reported.
Any other crash should be analyzed separately, and the conclusion
could very well be different.
> THanks. I'm sitting on a couple of hundred crashing cases, just
> trying to simplify them and see if they share the same cause (they
> probably do).
Well, I hope some of them are for different reasons.
It is strange you cannot trigger the stack-overflow protection in your
build, though. If you write a trivial infinite-recursion Lisp
function, and then run it after lifting max-lisp-eval-depth and
max-specpdl-size to the largest positive number, don't you see what I
saw on my system?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 6:21 bug#27585: segfault when evaluating a file containing only backticks Steve Kemp
2017-07-05 7:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-05 8:26 ` Steve Kemp
2017-07-05 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-05 18:55 ` Steve Kemp
2017-07-05 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 3:46 ` Steve Kemp
2017-07-06 15:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 15:33 ` Steve Kemp
2017-07-06 16:24 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-07-06 6:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-06 15:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 15:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-06 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 15:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-06 15:52 ` Daniel Colascione
2017-07-06 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 16:37 ` Daniel Colascione
2017-07-06 17:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-06 15:48 ` Daniel Colascione
2017-07-14 12:09 ` Paul Eggert
2017-07-14 13:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-15 5:03 ` Steve Kemp
2017-07-15 5:12 ` Paul Eggert
2017-07-15 7:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83efttmt3c.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=27585@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=steve@steve.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).