From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:14:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83efnpnolv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k1xhy5mi.fsf@gmail.com> <877ethy4ex.fsf@gmail.com> <83po79o09e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvwlwdgl.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8slnst2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vah1ql4i.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513800871 16013 195.159.176.226 (20 Dec 2017 20:14:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29785@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 21:14:26 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkl0-0003bG-Jk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:14:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkmu-0001YM-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkmd-0001TT-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkmY-0005D1-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkmY-0005Cl-5v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkmX-0005kx-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29785 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29785-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29785.151380092522050 (code B ref 29785); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2017 20:15:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRklr-0005jN-Kp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:15:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRklk-0005j0-Uj for 29785@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkla-0004Qv-QT for 29785@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkkw-0004B2-P1; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3631 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eRkkw-00047J-1i; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:14:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <87vah1ql4i.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:33 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141311 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 29785@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:33 +0100 > > >> As currently proposed, no. But if I enabled the separate history > >> unconditionally then it would. > > > > No, it won't. M-p and M-n would still work as they did before. > > The history list they would cycle through would be the eww history > list, not the global minibuffer history list. What am I missing? You don't miss anything. I'm saying that user-visible behavior won't change, as users don't care where the history is stored. Therefore, a defcustom, which is by definition for users and not for developers, is not needed, at least not IMO.