From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40845: SVG rendering issues Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:07:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83eesb7833.fsf@gnu.org> References: <72ebf5eb-6b00-ebb4-dab3-a047e35ae1ae@gmail.com> <83o8rf7fc0.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfmj7dh7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="18815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, 40845@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 20:08:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDn-0004fQ-Bh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:08:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42484 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDm-00006n-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDf-00005c-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDe-0004Ma-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDe-0004MV-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDe-0002zA-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40845 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40845-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40845.158783805711444 (code B ref 40845); Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40845) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2020 18:07:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60319 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDF-0002yV-Eq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPDD-0002yJ-Ow for 40845@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPD8-00048a-HA; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2776 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPD6-0007eu-EM; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:07:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:38:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179022 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:38:31 +0000 > Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, 40845@debbugs.gnu.org > > Correct: images which behave like character glyphs, but don't actually > have character codepoints, and aren't implemented by fonts. > > > So why are emoji relevant to this? > > An emoji is an example of an image which needs to know face properties > to blend in, or stick out, or whatever it is people who use them want > to happen. The intention was not that you'd use an emoji codepoint and > a font providing a character for that codepoint, which is a silly way > of implementing emoji. > > > > I want to be able to define something that behaves like a character, > > > including displaying differently in different frames and depending > > > on different face parameters such as weight, slant, and RTL-ness. > > > > All of that is possible with images, so I don't think I understand why > > we need to handle this as a character. > > Yes, my approach uses images, and no, it doesn't "handle this as a > character". It makes the glyph's apparent behavior match that of > character glyphs, while actually displaying an image spec which > changes with the properties of surrounding text, etc. > > > This very bug report was filed > > because I said we shouldn't use characters and fonts for these > > purposes, so let's not discuss that alternative, please, at least not > > here. > > No one was. Then I guess I don't understand your implementation at all.