From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35885: 25.2; Few mistakes in Emacs Manual (+ proposals) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:35:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83eeo1cuem.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9hkvygw.fsf@gnus.org> <47224e43-28c1-04d0-4418-b8f069a48b0c@gmail.com> <87d03qx2mm.fsf@gnus.org> <9d2594a9-8632-eb3b-18aa-359584c96753@gmail.com> <87k0xwj97f.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1s37xb2.fsf@gnus.org> <5047e985-673d-1c3c-4f97-0353e83285a9@gmail.com> <87o8n5xz9t.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14234"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mrsebastianurban@gmail.com, 35885@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 20 15:36:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kjh-0003c5-Ru for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:36:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49664 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kjg-0003bA-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kja-0003am-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kja-0002ji-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kja-0000hB-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35885 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35885-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35885.15979305312623 (code B ref 35885); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2020 13:35:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kj4-0000gF-Mm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kj1-0000g0-97 for 35885@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:35:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kiv-0002dy-Vc; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2056 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k8kiu-0006FF-L0; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:35:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87o8n5xz9t.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:44:30 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185688 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 35885@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:44:30 +0200 > > I have no opinion on whether to use @verb here or not -- perhaps Eli has? I don't think we should use @verb in this case, no.