From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46469: [External] : bug#46469: 27.1; `isearch-del-char' should move point further back Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:41:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83eehh9l0u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh09xggr.fsf@gmail.com> <83v9axdpkm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtw9xckr.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1lke9dc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im6wxw11.fsf@gmail.com> <838s7se42b.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnvbb9iq.fsf@gnu.org> <878s7rnmm8.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvapmin.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rdhruuo.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7581"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46469@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 15 20:42:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjl5-0001rB-Va for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:42:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjl4-0001Ob-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:42:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjkv-0001OQ-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjkv-00049i-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjkv-0003HP-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46469 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46469-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46469.161341807212544 (code B ref 46469); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46469) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2021 19:41:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjk7-0003GF-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjk5-0003G2-Dl for 46469@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjjz-0003db-H4; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4854 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lBjjy-0005E5-Hj; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:41:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871rdhruuo.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Augusto Stoffel on Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:31:27 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200083 Archived-At: > From: Augusto Stoffel > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , > 46469@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:31:27 +0100 > > In any case, I can add a defcustom (or a third independent command, > which would be more or less equivalent) if anyone else has interest in > this. But since that doesn't seem to be case, I would rather take back > my suggestion. As I said, I have no objection to supporting this behavior as an option, especially since you believe (and I have no reason to doubt) that others could like it. Please don't feel discouraged that both Juri and myself don't share your preferences: we are just 2 people. > My interest was to make Isearch a (very tiny) bit more user-friendly, > but having 3 versions of delete would have the opposite effect, IMHO. > I can live with the current one, even if it's suboptimal. I don't think what you suggest is really a 3rd command, it's more like a minor variant of one of the 2 existing commands. So I see no reason to withdraw your proposal, certainly not because of the above. Thanks.