From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46990: 28.0.50; popup menu not navigable via arrow keys on lucid build Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:50:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83eegln3rm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn0alx4d.fsf@yandex.com> <87ft15dici.fsf@tcd.ie> <87wnuhlnwd.fsf@yandex.com> <83im5yonpn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgzassr8.fsf@yandex.com> <83czw6ojyd.fsf@gnu.org> <9914d67ab1e37ee22af8@heytings.org> <87k0qdsvbs.fsf@yandex.com> <87a6r9su29.fsf@yandex.com> <83mtv9n605.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188e4acfe148f4@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11778"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46990@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 16:37:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKNNc-0002te-St for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:37:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKNNb-0002lB-Tq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:37:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMeU-0007hi-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMeT-0004MN-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMeT-00010W-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46990-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46990.16154742293829 (code B ref 46990); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2021 14:50:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMdw-0000zh-O3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMdv-0000zO-1P for 46990@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:50:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMdp-0003tj-AT; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2584 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKMdo-0004Zk-Br; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:50:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <30f0a4188e4acfe148f4@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:25:52 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202065 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:25:52 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 46990@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This could point to the portable dumper as the culprit (more accurately, > > something we do wrongly when producing the pdmp file), > > No, because this behavior predates the portable dumper. In the previous > test I went back to revision 5b464a9cea of the trunk three years ago; now > I went a bit further and the same behavior is also present in 62e170072e > six years ago. OK, thanks.