From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47244: 28.0.50; SIGSEGV in long-runnning Emacs Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83eegcfbrh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87im5ofp3z.fsf@md5i.com> <87czvwfoys.fsf@md5i.com> <83tup8fo1j.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnu4qvfi.fsf@md5i.com> <83sg4sfm1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmzwfgng.fsf@gnu.org> <83im5off16.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7l8fdfa.fsf@gnu.org> <871rccgqyz.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38865"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 47244@debbugs.gnu.org, mwd@cert.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 18 21:28:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzFZ-0009zy-Oz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:28:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35482 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzFY-000620-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzFS-00061k-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzFS-0002GV-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzFS-0004YR-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47244.161609927317491 (code B ref 47244); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2021 20:27:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzF5-0004Xm-TD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzF3-0004XV-OW for 47244@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzEv-00021j-QW; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1736 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMzEu-0008U7-Or; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:27:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871rccgqyz.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:13:40 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202650 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , mwd@md5i.com, 47244@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:13:40 +0100 > > > So the selected window's buffer was killed. How is that possible? > > Perhaps during run_window_change_functions. Something like that, yes. But I don't understand how that can happen technically: kill-buffer selects another buffer when killing the current one. So how was that buffer killed, and yet stayed current?