From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11651"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 18:32:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leKRj-0002qx-Bk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:32:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leKRi-0006zV-Ek for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK5D-0007C0-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK58-0003Rz-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK58-0003q3-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48221.162023090914727 (code B ref 48221); Wed, 05 May 2021 16:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:08:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4b-0003pT-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4Y-0003pC-K1 for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4R-000376-4i; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2909 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4P-0007VP-5n; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205726 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 > >> From: Eli Zaretskii > >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > >> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp > > > > Sorry, I meant native-compile. > > NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use > this? I thought native-compile was better because we talked about renaming a bunch of variables to have that prefix, so it would be consistent.