From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41438: [PATCH] Allow windmove keys to be bound without prefix or modifiers Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 09:49:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83eedyj66h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87imgpw7k3.fsf@warpmail.net> <87mu36enhl.fsf@posteo.net> <8735uru1py.fsf@gnus.org> <871r9yjyv5.fsf@posteo.net> <87cztizdar.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11108"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41438@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, juri@linkov.net To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 08:50:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhwC-0002hN-T4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 08:50:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhwB-0000n8-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhw2-0000mx-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhw2-0008Qg-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhw2-00010s-5I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 06:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41438.16217525723847 (code B ref 41438); Sun, 23 May 2021 06:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2021 06:49:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhvY-0000zy-6f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:49:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhvW-0000zm-NO for 41438@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhvP-00086h-Fw; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkhvO-0002g2-1c; Sun, 23 May 2021 02:49:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87cztizdar.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Sat, 22 May 2021 21:09:00 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207074 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 21:09:00 +0000 > Cc: 41438@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov > > Philip Kaludercic writes: > > > The code should probably be refactored, moving more of the common > > functionality into it's own function, but I am primarily wondering if > > using emulation-mode-map-alists the way I am proposing it here is ok. Or > > should I prefer minor-mode-map-alist? > > Here is a slightly cleaner version. Thanks. Should this be in NEWS?