From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49724: 27.2; Tramp /sudoedit:: does not preserve file security context Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 22:13:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83eebny181.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h7gjy3bl.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsw3y1yr.fsf@gnu.org> <87v94zmt08.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31094"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: xenodasein@tutanota.de, 49724@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 24 21:14:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N6A-0007wF-MW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 21:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46368 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N69-0000IH-P4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N62-0000I0-D8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N62-0001tq-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N61-00044K-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49724 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49724-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49724.162715402115600 (code B ref 49724); Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2021 19:13:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N5h-00043X-70 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N5e-00043H-E8 for 49724@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:13:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N5Y-0001aM-Os; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2631 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7N5Y-0003qa-Cx; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:13:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v94zmt08.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Sat, 24 Jul 2021 21:06:15 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210664 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: xenodasein@tutanota.de, 49724@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 21:06:15 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Did you try to use backup-by-copying, with or without > >> > backup-by-copying-when-privileged-mismatch? > >> > >> No, I can try again with an emacs -Q and some certain variables set if you require. > > > > Michael, could that help? > > It's already on my todo, but rather for tomorrow. I'm asking whether using backup-by-copying could have helped the OP in that use case. If it could, I'd ask the OP to try that, but if you say this is currently a deficiency for which we have no solution, then the OP doesn't need to try backup-by-copying.