From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49963: 28.0.50; isearch failing in Dired after rectangle-mark-mode and query-replace Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:37:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83eeb1fe7p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0kudsb8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r1f1fmi2.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf59fh7q.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7fxxq19.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49963@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, laslydone@protonmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 10 18:38:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUlc-0007sN-Do for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:38:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUlb-0003jJ-30 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUlO-0003if-N0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUlO-0001CY-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUlO-0008H9-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49963 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49963-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49963.162861345731764 (code B ref 49963); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 16:37:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUku-0008G5-Ik for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUkr-0008Fm-Ag for 49963@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUkj-0000kS-Th; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4236 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDUkj-00060W-Hi; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:37:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7fxxq19.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:44:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211531 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Monnier , 49963@debbugs.gnu.org, > juri@linkov.net, laslydone@protonmail.com > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:44:50 +0200 > > There isn't much difference between using add-function and add-hook most > of the time (although here we trip over a `let' binding not doing what > the author thought it did). > > add-function is better than add-hook in most ways, in my opinion, so I > think using it is fine. Well, it prevented me from immediately seeing which code is stealing C-s, so I beg to differ.