From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51659: 29.0.50; emoji.el: incorrect description for some emojis in emoji-list Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 17:16:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83ee7s808z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7co877h.fsf@polaris64.net> <871r3shwdy.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnlkggy3.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: simon@polaris64.net, 51659@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 07 16:17:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjv7-0001qo-9S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:17:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjv5-0001s0-Rn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:17:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjup-0001rR-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuo-0001tK-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuo-0002Bs-CX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51659 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51659-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51659.16362981947130 (code B ref 51659); Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2021 15:16:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuM-0001qZ-D1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:16:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuJ-0001kM-PV for 51659@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuE-0000gL-5k; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:16:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=imCNfJw4SwD0KEp23uSiJHGq/d//g3QE4X3UlAct5GI=; b=bdUWvXS8AWDDWjOEr4oQ 9gq5mVRuh7Tb9xv6etKT7iG9ys1rQPyBhIStKiICc+q6F4o8qop84nssaJCpp1W2aWcJr2Tj8x1kV 5dyZUPboYfrx6j3uqu/5mkq78u0dCW3iLtBiCrRu+X9LV+Og8NFMxpMIkeZiSFw5YaLSTZQigMOVj cbJfUzCmS1pbPupXjXSx6/S5NeP2rphAZNObFbxXYgo+eZU73DCLpyA9jCnN/N6g4outyGp+sQSjB aWkTBaJZsdouj2fSATAxKVEa0B11b8OJE2XR0k7fD7s3l7sOH3TgqZ2litpkDwbLI7zYwlpfmuYkT IxwCQcrh5Mm/eQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3160 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjjuD-0007md-Ls; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:16:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wnlkggy3.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:48:20 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:219260 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 51659@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 15:48:20 +0100 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Perhaps emoji.el is mis-parsing the emoji file... I'll try to debug. > > No, there's something weird going on in `find-composition' here? Eli, > could you have a look -- it's a bit mysterious. > > (insert "\x263A\xFE0Flalalalalal") > => ☺️lalalalalal > > (find-composition (point)) on both of those return the composition on > the first cluster. What are "both of those"? And what do you mean by the "first cluster"? > Now, the doc string says: > > --- > If there’s no composition at POS, and the optional 2nd argument LIMIT > is non-nil, search for a composition toward the position given by LIMIT. > --- > > So I interpret a nil value shouldn't search? It shouldn't search if POS is not included in any composition, no. > (find-composition (point) (point)) returns absolutely the same as a nil > value on the "lala" bits. That's expected. But I still don't understand what is the problem. What did you try to accomplish, and what happened instead?