From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56561: 29.0.50; Infloop in try_window Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 08:43:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83edykqopk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jzjwmhn.fsf@md5i.com> <83lesusl4w.fsf@gnu.org> <87lesumqgf.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ilnysbc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsj2s8fg.fsf@gnu.org> <83cze6s7xt.fsf@gnu.org> <83bktqs724.fsf@gnu.org> <878rotlpck.fsf@yahoo.com> <834jzhsj1a.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8rxk3eb.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zgh9r2he.fsf@gnu.org> <87lestk18e.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1wtqzqp.fsf@gnu.org> <87edyljvfs.fsf@yahoo.com> <83tu7hqvq1.fsf@gnu.org> <877d4djqhi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmi5qq8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87lestiadt.fsf@yahoo.com> <83o7xpqo1u.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsj1i6by.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mtd9qlkx.fsf@gnu.org> <8735f0in23.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34700"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 56561@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 17 07:44:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx4j-0008qy-1I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 07:44:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx4h-0008DF-Bh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx4U-0008D7-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx4U-00080z-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx4U-0003XY-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 05:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56561 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56561-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56561.165803661013558 (code B ref 56561); Sun, 17 Jul 2022 05:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2022 05:43:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx3y-0003Wc-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx3t-0003WJ-A7 for 56561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx3n-0007y3-U3; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:43:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=xD/+Ckg1ZFRdjmZG22Do2caV9gxCAhC7tv6VgwDEEGg=; b=LJXVKFT3PXNK hsNSmqfoONiuzsDWd0FsMmUESzwcWgoAv0scRa6f9CbLUKT1a5DE9kUUx7tQ8KGTWHK9NZuqhRXUc OmiPOloOPvDX4c9CEemrnOLBwYzylV8u3NR50sDB9q0K4ww6EFy0GvASGSR4No5yhrmkal6uw4S3v 1pR05ekGiN/qKXZGO3z+leuh+LkDngzmIHQYmJ60TqTXjQ30abMcD93EdUzLKw2l5I8Ye3IkiKYHF s3XiItNFlUD4ez8tKNT1ymh5YRhXYOhTg65Oc4FsDRrqqIYoZhQZ4x1CJa9BX28AKjOIN6HT80yTY qGRQ0jbci6eHf3iLgZ98uw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1779 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCx3m-0007Zw-SH; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 01:43:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8735f0in23.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 17 Jul 2022 08:45:56 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237229 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 56561@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 08:45:56 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Yes. The question was how to tell apart the situation where the rows > >> don't extend to ZV because of that bug, and when they don't extend to ZV > >> legitimately (since the tooltip is too small.) > > > > By "legitimately", you mean because of the restrictions in > > x-max-tooltip-size? I guess we should compare the values of > > x-max-tooltip-size with their default values. > > Indeed. But the default is 80 by 40, so a restriction is still placed. > So unfortunately that doesn't seem very helpful. I don't see the problem. If the default causes only partial display (which would really need a HUGE tooltip), then whoever does that without adjusting x-max-tooltip-size has only him/herself to blame, and I see no problem. We were talking about the conditions for an assertion. Assertions are for developers, they are compiled to nothing in a production build, so such bad code in a production build will show a partial text. While in a development build, we will in such a case see an assertion, which will tell us some code needs to be fixed. Where's the problem?