From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62072: 29.0.60; tree-sitter interferes with Custom Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:40:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83edpwzsnb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h6uujkjx.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87h6uujkjx.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ttyu14cf.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8jahx2p.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mt4m0w8d.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilf9igyb.fsf@yahoo.com> <835yb912sk.fsf@gnu.org> <871qlxhuoo.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zg8kzv2y.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkl0hk8e.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62072@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 13:41:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3o-0000tE-4s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:41:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3Y-0007TQ-BQ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3S-0007TB-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3R-00033t-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3R-0000Ks-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62072.16784520501262 (code B ref 62072); Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2023 12:40:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3F-0000KG-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:40:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pac3D-0000Jy-Ju for 62072@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:40:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pac37-00030Q-CC; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:40:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=5M1Wb9WRWpzG+Gr2OPbyMaFuVbGNafLsY2Na9soFaDQ=; b=bt5Efzh5cVEL gDYes1l5E+BabS9sHTMdUm0qLPr/qFByB0FowMlbHDdgK9tLW1A/96xWcOTr6Pn9v8Tg0T3/2Q3Z8 CzC6GFaXgSQ8eI8q9izsnN09JVP+/iPRpyR+aDI6tbvIZeYsvETosZiS9dju3hX2ZYSj4hU0X/VBI VF0mDHsyaSlAlFvZRhAIL0NfpRLSCjrlMfkpPI5RGCu8cn3jf5ALjCLv6vNYlXn5ygqC/ftnym1ZH fsGAFm6H89u9gtmq02vij8UuTCzuFg8HVMCjQyil6w8voLq1BlghFf2khmMoDai2q359Rlm37w3uq w/G99kUu4e6TRLG4HxEHfQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pac36-0007Ac-S5; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:40:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bkl0hk8e.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:19:29 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:257692 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: 62072@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:19:29 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Why is what? > > I mean, why can't we wrap whatever in Custom is generating the warning > inside `with-no-warnings' for now? If you can suggest a patch which affects only the cases where these options are evaluated as part of a large group, that's fine by me. The problem is that we _do_ want the warning if the use customizes specific options that require tree-sitter. If Customize can distinguish between those, I'm all for warning in one case, but not in the other.