From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83d3lwrunk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20110130185857.ABE7116C28C@purefun.sfo.corp.google.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299960432 4785 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2011 20:07:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7943@debbugs.gnu.org To: Warren Harris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 21:07:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyV5e-0005oU-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:07:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PyV5e-0002Ew-1K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41453 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PyV5Y-0002Ep-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:07:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PyV5X-0002fR-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PyV5X-0002fN-6c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyUkJ-0002rb-2o; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:45:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7943.129995906110949 (code B ref 7943); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2011 19:44:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyUjc-0002qY-SV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyUjZ-0002qJ-Ga for 7943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LHY00600MPB8I00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7943@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:44:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.58.59]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LHY0050QMTLE2A0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:44:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:45:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44943 Archived-At: > From: Warren Harris > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:39:10 -0800 > Cc: > > Any update on this bug? Thanks, Sorry for such a long delay. This is not a bug. The xterm colors are defined on lisp/term/xterm.el as follows: (defvar xterm-standard-colors ;; The names in the comments taken from XTerm-col.ad in the xterm ;; distribution, see ftp://dickey.his.com/xterm/. RGB values are ;; from rgb.txt. '(("black" 0 ( 0 0 0)) ; black ("red" 1 (205 0 0)) ; red3 ("green" 2 ( 0 205 0)) ; green3 ("yellow" 3 (205 205 0)) ; yellow3 ("blue" 4 ( 0 0 238)) ; blue2 ("magenta" 5 (205 0 205)) ; magenta3 ("cyan" 6 ( 0 205 205)) ; cyan3 ("white" 7 (229 229 229)) ; gray90 ("brightblack" 8 (127 127 127)) ; gray50 ("brightred" 9 (255 0 0)) ; red ("brightgreen" 10 ( 0 255 0)) ; green ("brightyellow" 11 (255 255 0)) ; yellow ("brightblue" 12 (92 92 255)) ; rgb:5c/5c/ff ("brightmagenta" 13 (255 0 255)) ; magenta ("brightcyan" 14 ( 0 255 255)) ; cyan ("brightwhite" 15 (255 255 255))) ; white As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually gray90, and its RGB components are 229 decimal, or E5 hex. Exactly what you see. This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for brightwhite, see above. So I suggest to close this bug.