From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9203: 24.0.50; some Clang experience Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:11:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83d3grdfkb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83livgc5t1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ei17dhe3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312035122 6717 80.91.229.12 (30 Jul 2011 14:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Peter_Dyballa@Freenet.DE, 9203@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 30 16:11:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGi-0007rz-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:11:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52064 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGh-00057h-Jj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGf-00057c-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGd-0005tp-N1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGd-0005tl-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGo-00013H-GB; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9203 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9203.13120350823992 (code B ref 9203); Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2011 14:11:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAGA-00012K-IF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnAG7-00012C-OM for 9203@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LP500600GJGQV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9203@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:10:49 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.48.51]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LP5005BUGPZRSG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:10:47 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49721 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Peter_Dyballa@Freenet.DE, 9203@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:49:32 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > `ret' is the value returned by regexec > > No, it isn't. Grow up, will you?