From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16901: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:26:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83d2i7wbyc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5d9f431d-d0c3-4cfa-b9e5-07cdf6718d5a@default> <83mwhbwm9j.fsf@gnu.org> <53107F45.3060502@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393597635 12172 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2014 14:27:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16901@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 15:27:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOPG-0004Hs-Tn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:27:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOPG-0002f3-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:27:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOP8-0002Yd-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:27:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOP4-0002GY-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOP4-0002GJ-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOP1-00010r-Vk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:27:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:27:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16901 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16901-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16901.13935975683809 (code B ref 16901); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:27:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16901) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2014 14:26:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOO7-0000zM-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:39465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WJOO3-0000z6-3f for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1P00500M2RIW00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:26:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1P005DBMRDK000@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:26:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <53107F45.3060502@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86392 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:21:25 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: Juanma Barranquero , drew.adams@oracle.com, > 16901@debbugs.gnu.org > > As usual, it's hard to say anything without a clean recipe to reproduce. Would it be possible to install some debugging code that could pinpoint the problem, or at least give further ideas? Or is the problem so subtle that any code which uses strings could be the culprit?