From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17837: 24.4.50; Search very slow Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83d2dzsk48.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403538572 20712 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2014 15:49:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17837@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 23 17:49:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6Ug-0008Od-0X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:49:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6Uf-0002qS-Lr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6UW-0002oV-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6UQ-0008Uq-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6UP-0008Um-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6UP-0001cf-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17837.14035384956166 (code B ref 17837); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2014 15:48:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6Tb-0001bH-5O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz6TU-0001aU-VE for 17837@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N7M00K00P1ALF00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 17837@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:57 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N7M00KPAP7V4590@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:47:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90695 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:26:46 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > > I get the impression that searching fontifies all the text > it moves through. Is that really necessary? It is a big pain in the neck. It should only fontify the displayed parts (and sometimes slightly above and below), not everything. I will take a look. Can you compare what you see with some older version of Emacs, like 23.x? I tried, and they all seem to be of approximately the same speed (or lack thereof).