From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18237: Small fix for MSDOS Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:05:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83d2c8jhck.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwbcjk8f.fsf@gnu.org> <83iom0jj4o.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407697590 5955 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2014 19:06:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18237@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 10 21:06:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRb-0007Sg-Nc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:06:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60677 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRb-0003B9-AL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRT-0003Aq-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRO-0004mf-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRN-0004mS-VD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYRN-0002hK-Kx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18237 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18237-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18237.140769753410336 (code B ref 18237); Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2014 19:05:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYQv-0002gd-45 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55066) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XGYQr-0002gK-IE for 18237@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 15:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NA300B00U397C00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 18237@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:05:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NA300AAMUCYYA50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:05:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92392 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:42:14 +0100 > From: Reuben Thomas > Cc: 18237-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I'd prefer that all the changes for such a build be committed at once > > together, not bit by bit, and only if you eventually succeed to > > produce a working binary using this method. > > Sorry, I was trying to separate my patch into parts with different > implications (e.g. no effect on the current DOS build system; some effect > on that system but not more generally; more general changes); but instead > I'll concentrate on producing a single patch that, as you say, results in a > working binary. Yes, I'd prefer that. This makes it easier to consider all of its implications at once. (You can, of course, make separate small commits on your feature branch, as you work on this; then they will all be merged onto the trunk as a single merge-commit.) > I am closing this bug; since you diagnosed my other patch submission as a > more general bug in configuration, I'll look into a fix for it at that > level. Thanks.