From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19547: 25.0.50; throw-on-input "fires" when switching workspace Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:14:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83d26n6lpp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874ms03qj1.fsf@web.de> <83387j67yg.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppanwrpy.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420881319 3942 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2015 09:15:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19547@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 10 10:15:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8V-00019h-5u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:15:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54588 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8U-0005Ju-5k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8Q-0005ID-CP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:15:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8N-0002ci-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8N-0002cD-3a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s8M-00070J-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19547 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19547-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19547.142088128726885 (code B ref 19547); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 09:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2015 09:14:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s83-0006zS-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:43836) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9s81-0006zG-3O for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:14:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHY00G00E9FC500@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:11:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHY00EPKEV9KA30@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:11:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ppanwrpy.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98162 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: 19547@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:48:25 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It could be that this particular event can be filtered out, but that's > > just the top of the iceberg. There are way too many different events > > flowing into Emacs on a typical modern system, keyboard being just a > > small part of that. > > Mmh, I expected that this could be the case. But is there no more or > less reasonable way to classify events? Probably not... If you are thinking about a general-purpose infrastructure to ignore some specific classes of events, we could try considering that. Of course, any such filtering can always be done on the application level, and the question then is how more useful will it be to have it in the infrastructure.