From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23574: 24.5; Overzealous underlining in emacs-nox Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 19:20:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1nxudrb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83porxwg1f.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465057398 22856 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2016 16:23:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23574@debbugs.gnu.org To: Colin Woodbury Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 04 18:23:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EK4-0007nl-K8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:21:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EK0-0005Pm-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJv-0005Pf-Hl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJq-0000ZC-Gz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJq-0000Z8-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJq-000787-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23574.146505722727348 (code B ref 23574); Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2016 16:20:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJH-000772-J2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJG-00076q-6m for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJ6-0000Ss-3j for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJ6-0000SO-0J; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2837 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9EJ3-00006I-Cu; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:20:14 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Colin Woodbury on Sat, 4 Jun 2016 08:54:27 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119064 Archived-At: > From: Colin Woodbury > Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 08:54:27 -0700 > > Thanks for the response, Eli. If it's not a bug in terminal emacs, then why do GUI emacs and terminal emacs > display different things? Note from the images that the empty space in GUI is _not_ given the same > overlay/face as the text. > > Thoughts? If you show me some Lisp which produces these different effects in X and non-X sessions, I could try looking for the reason. All I've seen is a screenshot, from which I deduced (perhaps incorrectly) what was done to produce it. Thanks.