From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27427: 26.0.50; Native line numbers lead to display error in company-mode popup Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:29:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83d19mrc3d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <611468a0-3115-813a-7347-d0c06e155831@web.de> <83vanrx5uo.fsf@gnu.org> <362a7d18-7f05-2e99-f8b3-41c353cf234f@yandex.ru> <83h8zawvih.fsf@gnu.org> <00f59a24-2d80-ca47-b6f3-3d219aa5aa3f@yandex.ru> <8360fqvz9x.fsf@gnu.org> <6aa4616d-79f7-db1b-c048-076a9a48596f@yandex.ru> <83tw39urzq.fsf@gnu.org> <4c4b873b-2bec-1c12-82f5-325b558bea93@yandex.ru> <83o9tgul6h.fsf@gnu.org> <49b431fd-aaa4-e7ca-06fc-7146a0a5692c@yandex.ru> <83a84zul0d.fsf@gnu.org> <513eca6f-998a-a937-76c4-7cf2fb0ff787@yandex.ru> <83wp81u8rz.fsf@gnu.org> <8ec1b301-79dc-7d11-b3f9-85ae2e925785@yandex.ru> <594FDDC5.6040009@gmx.at> <83zicwrkmu.fsf@gnu.org> <5950C342.7010908@gmx.at> <83mv8ussb6.fsf@gnu.org> <595203DE.1040608@gmx.at> <837ezxsd02.fsf@gnu.org> <59527971.5000205@gmx.at> <83y3sdqtto.fsf@gnu.org> <59536CA6.10608@gmx.at> <83r2y4qcs1.fsf@gnu.org> <5953F706.7080405@gmx.at> <83o9t8q6u1.fsf@gnu.org> <5954A995.9@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498753947 16985 195.159.176.226 (29 Jun 2017 16:32:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alexanderm@web.de, 27427@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 29 18:32:20 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcMb-0003rj-Ew for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:32:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40345 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcMg-0000Dy-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcLS-0007sg-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcLO-00018e-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcLO-00018V-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcLO-0000cW-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27427 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27427-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27427.14987538242338 (code B ref 27427); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27427) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2017 16:30:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcKl-0000be-PI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcKk-0000bR-M1 for 27427@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcKa-0000fo-T9 for 27427@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcKa-0000fj-R1; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3120 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dQcKZ-0007xF-Uz; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:30:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <5954A995.9@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:17:41 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134033 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:17:41 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: dgutov@yandex.ru, alexanderm@web.de, 27427@debbugs.gnu.org > > So the answer to your question is: We can supply any restrictions the > TTY display code would need although I'd prefer to call this a "special > kind of frame" and not a "special kind of window". I prefer "window" for the simple reason that doing so will most probably wreak the least havoc on TTY display, in particular because it won't invalidate the assumption that only one frame is visible at any given time. Also, frames can have decorations, even on a TTY, which we are better without in this case. And finally, you most probably remember that TTY redisplay is frame-based, so having just one of them would fit better. Should be a nice project. Any takers?