From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43519: 28.0.50; Overlay at end of minibuf hides minibuf's real content Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:47:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83d02fxbs2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo0p1twr.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1qx1q9v.fsf@gnu.org> <838sd425l2.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuvrxlho.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34008"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, 43519@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 19:56:02 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKQ2j-0008hL-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:56:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKQ2i-0007dw-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:56:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPv1-00075N-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPv0-00011i-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPv0-0003de-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43519.160071043413909 (code B ref 43519); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 17:47:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPuD-0003cH-Uj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPuC-0003c2-L4 for 43519@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPu7-0000yh-BW; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4191 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKPu6-0007Vu-Qh; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:47:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:28:59 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188627 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Gregory Heytings , 43519@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:28:59 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii [2020-09-21 17:17:23] wrote: > > For example: would it be okay to start the display at > > the beginning of the screen line where we end up after > > move_it_vertically_backward returns? > > Sounds reasonable. Thanks. if this is agreed upon, I will try to come up with a (tested) patch. > Do we have something like tests (or at least a list of recipes to > try) so we can catch regressions? Not for the mini-window display, I'm afraid. > It seems this part of the code is trying to satisfy needs which > aren't clearly expressed anywhere, so while this suggestion may > sound good to me (just like the patch I just sent), I'm afraid it > will bring back other problems. That's a risk, yes. That's why I prefer "small changes", i.e. changes that aren't supposed to affect scenarios unrelated to the ones discussed.