From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)" Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:22:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83d01ua4b5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0FF2F801815441C3B5385CE3202E16A0@us.oracle.com> <87364basd9.fsf@gnus.org> <09025e7c-3f7b-4e39-b573-776fba837ceb@default> <87o8li933g.fsf@web.de> <726d8e32-8682-4d03-a558-c02b31c5e679@default> <87k0w690gg.fsf@web.de> <87blhfrqzs.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 14086@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 07 09:23:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3n3-00038q-Av for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59492 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3n2-0005cz-DQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mw-0005bt-PP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mw-0001CS-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mw-0004OS-Be for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14086 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 14086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14086.160205534816837 (code B ref 14086); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 07:22:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mO-0004NV-2m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mM-0004NF-SH for 14086@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mD-0001Ag-Lo; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3383 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ3mD-0003Ii-1u; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:22:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blhfrqzs.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:20:23 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189988 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:20:23 +0200 > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 14086@debbugs.gnu.org > > Drew Adams writes: > > > Currently we say only that it is shadowed by another "mode". > > Isn't that wording what the commit that we had pointed you at changed? > The text doesn't speak about a "mode" any more. > > And is the word "shadowed" really unclear? It isn't unclear to me, FWIW.