From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41852: 27.0.50; text-scale commands don't scale header of tabulated-list-mode Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:45:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83d01dnegn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <955fe4fe-a64d-b7c6-fe31-7efd810f97a5@ims.co.at> <83mu553e0x.fsf@gnu.org> <953c6df9-59b4-8b57-0be3-600d147fe9c7@ims.co.at> <83y2k2pabb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnzmnioj.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfg1nfv1.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 16:51:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsye-0003Dh-6a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:51:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsyc-0001IB-VF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUstm-0004hp-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUstm-0002rz-0z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUstl-0001YN-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41852.16032051285928 (code B ref 41852); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2020 14:45:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUstE-0001XY-3P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:45:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUstD-0001XJ-2t for 41852@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUst6-0002eE-9n; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1939 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUst5-0007RP-Kf; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:45:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:40:17 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191097 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:40:17 +0000 > Cc: thomas.hisch@ims.co.at, 41852@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> Do you mean something like this? > > > > Yes. Except that now I'm asking whether we need to obsolete the > > variable. is that just because of the name? > > I guess we could re-use the old name if we really want to. But it would > still be a breaking change, since this is now a list instead of a single > value. That's also easy to handle in a compatible way, right?